The US Copyright Office has finally stopped playing nice. After two years of "maybe," they’ve drawn a hard line in the sand regarding AI-generated music. For anyone in the sync game, this is the most important legal memo of the year.
The Reality Check:
If an AI did the "creative heavy lifting," you don't own the work. Period. If your workflow is: Prompt -> Export -> Upload, you have zero legal standing to sue for infringement. You’ve created "Public Domain" content. This means a competitor could take your song, put it in their commercial, and you wouldn't have a legal leg to stand on to stop them or claim royalties.
The "Safe Harbor" Strategy:
To protect your "Sync" income, you need to move from Generative to Hybrid. The Copyright Office now looks for "Substantial Human Intervention." This means you need to show that you didn't just "order" the music—you "steered" it.
Keep your project files. Document where you re-played a bassline, where you manually chopped a sample, or where you added a live vocal top-line. That paper trail is the difference between a "disposable file" and a "protectable asset."
LATEST FROM THE CUE SHEET
